17 September 2009
Dear District Court and Judge,
I the plaintiff seek for immediately judicial conference for the case CIV-2009-092-1072 because the defendant the Ministry of Social didn’t answer and couldn’t answer the interrogatories the plaintiff served them on the 17 August and 27 August 2009 because there are no New Zealand Law, Act, Bills and Rules could support the defendant. According to the District Court Rules and the official document from the District Court that:
Non Compliance: In the event of non compliance in the exchange of information and documentation, the solicitor for the non-defaulting party shall immediately seek a conference. In the absence of good reason to the contrary, peremptory orders requiring the offending party to remedy the default and pay appropriate costs will be made.
Non co-operation: In the event of non co-operation in the exchange of information and documentation, the solicitor for the non-default party should immediately seek a conference. In the absence of good reason to the contrary, peremptory orders requiring the offending party remedy the default and pay appropriate costs will be made.
The defendant is already the Non Compliance and Non co-operation party. I the plaintiff could award the right to seek for immediate judicial conference by default for the case CIV-2009-092-1072. I don’t need to wait until 30th of September or to have any court hearing. I am looking forward to hearing from you!
Upon the grounds:
Those who break the law are subjected to justice.
违法者要受到法律制裁。
All person should be treated with justice in NZ.
人人都应受到公平待遇。
UPON THE GROUNDS:
This application is made in reliance and under
Defamation Act 1992
Summary Offences Act 1981
Criminal Act 1961
The Act of Torts:
Deliberate Falsehoods,
Defamation
Invasion of Privacy
Abuse of the legal procedure
Trespass Act
17 September 2009
TO: The Registrar of the District Court Manukau
AND TO: The Defendant
